Knowing the limit is the easy part — it's usually one search away. What's harder to find in one place is the combination of what the platform's hard limit is, where it truncates in the feed before the reader has to take an action, and where content actually tends to perform within that range. That's what this guide covers for each platform.
Quick reference table
| Platform | Hard limit | Truncates at | Sweet spot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twitter / X | 280 chars | No truncation | Under 200 chars |
| LinkedIn post | 3,000 chars | ~210 chars | 1,000–1,500 chars |
| LinkedIn article | 125,000 chars | No truncation | 1,000–2,000 words |
| Instagram caption | 2,200 chars | ~125 chars | 138–150 chars visible; more if story-driven |
| YouTube title | 100 chars | ~60–70 chars in search | Under 60 chars |
| YouTube description | 5,000 chars | ~157 chars | Key info first 200 chars |
| Facebook post | 63,206 chars | ~477 chars | 40–80 chars for ads; 1–2 sentences for posts |
| TikTok caption | 2,200 chars | ~100 chars | Under 150 chars |
| Google Ads headline | 30 chars | None — strict limit | Use all 30 |
| Google Ads description | 90 chars | None — strict limit | Use all 90 |
| Email subject line | Varies by client | 40–60 chars | Under 50 chars |
| Email preview text | Varies by client | 85–100 chars | Under 90 chars |
Need to check your character or word count quickly before posting?
Open Word CounterTwitter / X
Twitter / X
YouTube
YouTube
TikTok
TikTok
Google Ads
Google Ads (Responsive Search Ads)
Performance Max campaigns have different asset limits — headlines up to 15 (same 30-char limit), descriptions up to 5 (same 90-char limit), and additional asset types including images, logos, and video. The copy limits above apply specifically to Responsive Search Ads in standard Search campaigns.
Email subject lines
Blog posts and long-form content
Blog posts don't have a platform-imposed character limit, which is simultaneously freeing and misleading — the absence of a hard ceiling doesn't mean longer is better. Word count for blog content is worth thinking about in two separate dimensions: what search engines reward, and what readers actually finish.
Google has explicitly confirmed that word count is not a ranking signal by itself. What does correlate with ranking is comprehensive coverage of the topic relative to competing pages — which in practice often means longer content, but the causal relationship runs through depth, not length. Adding words that don't add information does nothing for rankings and actively reduces the proportion of readers who reach the end.
- News and announcements: 300–500 words. Short is appropriate here.
- Informational posts (how-to, explainers): 1,500–2,500 words. Enough to cover the topic properly without padding.
- Competitive, comprehensive guides: 2,500–4,000 words. Justified when the topic genuinely requires that depth.
- Anything over 4,000 words: Only where the content cannot be responsibly covered in less. Content this long should have a clear, navigable structure — a table of contents, clear headings, and a design that lets readers jump to what they need.
Reading time is often more useful than word count as a practical guide. At an average reading pace of around 200–250 words per minute for online content, a 1,500-word post takes about six to seven minutes to read from start to finish. Whether your audience will spend that time depends entirely on whether the content earns it — check your reading time before publishing alongside word count, and ask honestly whether the topic justifies asking for that much of someone's attention.